EnglishPortugueseRussianSpanish

Monday- Friday 8:30 am - 5 pm
  Contact : (954) 454-1066

All Posts in Category: Uncategorized

HIDRAdisk Is a Validated Visual Tool to Assess Hidradenitis Suppurativa Burden

Share this content:
Hidradenitis suppurativa has a significant negative impact on patient quality of life, which has been reported to be greater than that of atopic eczema and psoriasis.
Hidradenitis suppurativa has a significant negative impact on patient quality of life, which has been reported to be greater than that of atopic eczema and psoriasis.

The HIDRAdisk, a validated, visual, interactive electronic instrument completed together by patients and dermatologists, is an easy-to-use quality of life tool that could improve the management of hidradenitis suppurativa while also strengthening patient-clinician relationships, according to a study published in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venerology.

The chronic relapsing inflammatory skin disease hidradenitis suppurativa has a significant negative impact on patient quality of life, which has been reported to be greater than that of atopic eczema and psoriasis. This multicenter, longitudinal, observational study was designed to demonstrate the reliability, responsiveness, and overall validity of HIDRAdisk, a new tool designed to rapidly assess hidradenitis suppurativa burden with an intuitive graphic visual of the measurement outcome. Study authors compared HIDRAdisk with the following validated questionnaires: Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-General Health (WPAI:GH), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Skindex-16. They evaluated HIDRAdisk’s correlation with disease severity as measured by Hurley stage and Hidradenitis Suppurativa Physician Global Assessment (HS-PGA).

Continue Reading Below

Participants were identified from 27 Italian dermatologic centers (N=140; mean age 34.9±11.0 years, 59% women). HIDRAdisk showed a statistically significant correlation with both Hurley stage (P =.0002) and HS-PGA (P =.0041), a good correlation with WPAI:GH (correlation coefficient: 0.5947), and a strong correlation with Skindex-16 (correlation coefficient: 0.7568) and DLQI (correlation coefficient: 0.6651). Very good internal consistency was demonstrated, with raw and standardized Cronbach coefficient values greater than >0.80 (0.894 and 0.898, respectively), correlation between the 10 items ranging between 0.308 and 0.673, good test-retest reliability (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.8331; P <0.0001), and statistically significant responsiveness to changes.

Study investigators concluded that “the HIDRAdisk is a validated visual instrument administered on electronic devices, completed by patient and dermatologist together, making it an easy-to-use [quality of life] tool that, in our wishes, should be implemented soon in routine clinical practice to improve the management of [hidradenitis suppurativa], as well as strengthen the patient–physician relationship.”

Follow @DermAdvisor

Reference

Peris K, Lo Schiavo A, Fabbrocini G, et al. HIDRAdisk: validation of an innovative visual tool to assess the burden of hidradenitis suppurativa [published online January 11, 2019]. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15425

Read More

Calcipotriol Plus Betamethasone Dipropionate Foam Offers Rapid, Effective Itch Relief in Psoriasis

Share this content:
There was no correlation between itch visual analogue scale score and modified Psoriasis Area and Severity Index at baseline,
There was no correlation between itch visual analogue scale score and modified Psoriasis Area and Severity Index at baseline,

The use of calcipotriol 50 µg/g plus betamethasone dipropionate 0.5 mg/g cutaneous (Cal/BD) foam in patients with psoriasis provides quicker, more effective relief of itch compared with foam vehicle, with significant improvements in sleep and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores, according to a study published in the Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Investigators pooled data from 3 multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, blinded trials (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01536886 [phase 2], NCT01866163 [phase3], and NCT02132936 [phase 3]) and sought to assess the efficacy of topical fixed-dose combination therapy with Cal/BD on itch, itch-associated loss of sleep, and health-related quality of life vs foam vehicle among adults with mild to severe psoriasis.

Continue Reading Below

Patients with visual analogue scale (VAS) scores >40 (range, 1-100) were evaluated. Study outcomes included the following: itch VAS score reduction >40, ≥70% improvement in itch (Itch70) or itch-related loss of sleep, 75% improvement in modified Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (excluding the head; mPASI75), and DLQI scores 0/1 through 4 weeks.

Among a total of 837 patients with itch measurements available, 37 had baseline itch VAS=0 and were excluded from the analysis. Of the remaining 800 patients (Cal/BD foam: n=610; foam vehicle: n=190), 484 had baseline itch VAS >40. No association was reported between itch VAS score and mPASI at baseline. In patients with baseline itch VAS >40, significantly more individuals attained itch VAS reduction >40 in the active treatment vs vehicle treatment group from day 5 on (day 5: 57.5% vs 40.2% [P <.05]; and week 4: 83.0% vs 45.8% [P <.001]).

Furthermore, significantly more Cal/BD foam-treated patients compared with foam vehicle-treated patients achieved Itch70 at day 3 (34.2% vs 22.5%; P <.05) through week 4 (79.3% vs 38.1%; P <.001). Among patients with baseline itch VAS >40 and sleep loss >20, improvements in itch-associated sleep loss were seen at week 1 and continued through 4 weeks, with itch-related improvements occurring before mPASI75 improvements.

Moreover, significant differences were observed in the proportion of Cal/BD foam-treated patients vs foam vehicle-treated patients with baseline DLQI >10 (n=172 vs n=50) attaining DLQI ≤1 (25.0% vs 4.0%; P =.001) and DLQI 0 (17.4% vs 2.0%, respectively; P =.006) at week 4.

Limitations of the current study include the lack of validated itch-related sleep loss measurement tools, as well as the need for different patient pools, the lower patient numbers available for the earlier times (ie, days 3 and 5), and the lack of pooled efficacy data that compared Cal/BD foam and its monocomponents.

The investigators concluded that this pooled analysis of patients with psoriasis demonstrated that Cal/BD foam provides more rapid, effective relief from itch than foam vehicle, and is linked to significant improvements in DLQI and sleep among this population.

Disclosures: LEO Pharma sponsored this study. Multiple authors disclosed affiliations with pharmaceutical companies. See the reference for complete disclosure information.

Follow @DermAdvisor

Reference

Jalili A, Lebwohl M, Gold LS, et al. Itch relief in patients with psoriasis: effectiveness of calcipotriol plus betamethasone dipropionate foam [published December 6, 2018]. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15393

Read More

Psoriasis, Especially Severe Disease, Associated With Increased Risk for All-Cause Mortality

Share this content:
Although associations were consistent, a key limitation of this meta-analysis was that included studies were heterogeneous in several aspects.
Although associations were consistent, a key limitation of this meta-analysis was that included studies were heterogeneous in several aspects.

Psoriasis is associated with elevated rates of all-cause mortality in a dose-response manner with disease severity, as well as with cause-specific mortality, according to the results published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

With the recognition that an overview of the mortality risk associated with psoriasis is lacking, investigators conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review of risk for mortality among individuals with psoriasis. Included in the review were studies that reported all-cause or cause-specific mortality risk estimates in persons with psoriasis compared with the general population or with individuals free of psoriasis. A total of 12 studies were included in the analysis.

Among 6 studies of 299,374 patients with psoriasis, the pooled risk ratio (RR) for all-cause mortality was 1.21 (95% CI, 1.14-1.28; P <.001). Among 4 studies of 265,292 individuals with mild psoriasis, the pooled RR for all-cause mortality was 1.13 (95% CI, 1.09-1.16; P =.048). Among 6 studies of 36,428 patients with severe psoriasis, the pooled RR for all-cause mortality was 1.52 (95% CI, 1.35-1.72; P <.001).

Continue Reading Below

Among 5 studies of 285,675 patients with psoriasis, the pooled RR for cardiovascular (CV) mortality was 1.15 (95% CI, 1.09-1.21; P =.02). Among 3 studies of 188,223 individuals with mild psoriasis, the pooled RR for CV mortality was 1.05 (95% CI, 0.92-1.20; P <.001). Among 4 studies of 17,317 patients with severe psoriasis, the pooled RR for CV mortality was 1.38 (95% CI, 1.09-1.74; P <.001).

With respect to non-CV causes of death, the risk for mortality from kidney and liver disease was highest. The RRs for mortality from kidney disease was 2.16 (95% CI, 1.37-3.40) among all patients with psoriasis, 2.20 (95% CI, 1.36-3.56) among individuals with mild psoriasis, and 3.54 (95% CI, 1.73-7.26) among those with severe psoriasis. In addition, the RRs for mortality from liver disease were 2.00 (95% CI, 1.34-2.99) among all patients with psoriasis, 4.26 (95% CI, 1.87-9.73) among individuals with mild psoriasis, and 3.97 (95% CI, 2.87-5.50) among those with severe psoriasis.

Moreover, the RRs for mortality from infections was 1.24 (95% CI, 1.14-1.31) among all patients with psoriasis, 1.41 (95% CI, 1.11-1.79) among individuals with mild psoriasis, and 1.58 (95% CI, 1.22-2.05) among those with severe psoriasis. Significantly increased mortality risk from neoplasms was also reported among patients with severe psoriasis, as well as from chronic lower respiratory disease in all individuals with psoriasis and in those with mild psoriasis.

The investigators concluded that on the basis of the findings from this study, patients with psoriasis, and in particular those with risk factors and severe disease, should receive appropriate screening and preventive interventions. Additional research is warranted to evaluate the effect of psoriasis on mortality independent of mortality risk factors, to elucidate cause-specific mortality among patients with psoriasis, and to establish the mechanisms that induce excess mortality.

Follow @DermAdvisor

Reference

Dhana A, Yen H, Yen H, Cho E. All-cause and cause-specific mortality in psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis [published online December 24, 2018]. J Am Acad Dermatol. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.12.037

Read More

Examining Molecular, Histopathologic Changes With Risankizumab vs Ustekinumab in Psoriasis

Share this content:
At week 4 of treatment, there was a common decrease in 2645 genes expressed in lesioned skin between risankizumab vs ustekinumab.
At week 4 of treatment, there was a common decrease in 2645 genes expressed in lesioned skin between risankizumab vs ustekinumab.

In patients with psoriasis, treatment with risankizumab is associated with changes in the molecular and histopathologic profiles of lesional skin after 4 weeks compared with ustekinumab, according to study results published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

The investigators used the results of 2 studies – a phase 1 single-rising-dose study of risankizumab therapy (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01577550) and a phase 2 study of risankizumab vs ustekinumab (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02054481) –  to explore the similarities and differences in the histopathologic and molecular profiles of skin lesions from patients with psoriasis who had been treated with risankizumab or ustekinumab. Lesional skin biopsies obtained from patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who had participated in the phase 1 (n=39) and phase 2 (n=60) studies were analyzed by histopathology, RNA-sequencing, and immunochemistry.

Continue Reading Below

Results showed that treatment with risankizumab generated a rapid decrease in protein and transcriptomic biomarkers associated with the interleukin-23 (IL-23) pathway, with these reductions maintained through 8 weeks. At week 4, risankizumab decreased histopathologic biomarker expression, including K16, Ki67, CD3, CD11c, DC-LAMP, lipocalin-2, β-defensin 2, and S100A7.

Based on global histopathology scoring, 54% and 69% of patients who were treated with risankizumab 90 mg or risankizumab 180 mg, respectively, were graded as “excellent improvement,” compared with 29% of patients treated with ustekinumab. At 4 weeks, a common decrease in 2645 genes expressed in lesional skin was reported between risankizumab and ustekinumab, with a significant reduction observed in 2682 genes that are unique to risankizumab therapy.

Cytokine-induced transcriptome changes in key cell lines linked to psoriatic skin lesions— epidermal cells, keratinocytes, and monocytes—demonstrated a greater reduction in expression with risankizumab treatment compared with ustekinumab therapy.

The investigators concluded that the key pathways and types of cells identified in this study may help build hypotheses for the observed differences in efficacy reported according to biologic agent. Additional studies are warranted in order to further characterize the profile of risankizumab and compare the agent with ustekinumab and other biologics, thus enabling an improved understanding of the relationship of these agents to longer-term efficacy and the potential remission of psoriasis.

Follow @DermAdvisor

Reference

Visvanathan S, Baum P, Vinisko R, et al. Psoriatic skin molecular and histopathological profiles following treatment with risankizumab versus ustekinumab [published online December 19, 2018]. J Allergy Clin Immunol. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2018.11.042

Read More

ACIP Updates Recommendations for US Adult Immunization Schedule

This article originally appeared here.

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have approved and released 2019 recommendations for the adult immunization schedule in the United States. An overview of the recommended schedule can be found in a new edition of the Annals of Internal Medicine.

ACIP Vaccine Recommendations: Overview

In the 2019 update, the ACIP provides 3-step instructions on how to use the recommended vaccine schedule, a brand new Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule by Age Group (Table 1) and Recommended Adult Immunization Schedule by Medical Condition and Other Indications (Table 2), as well as recommendations for the influenza and hepatitis A and B vaccines, and an overview of vaccination coverage rates since 2015.

The new schedule features a simplified cover page that contains 3-step instructions on how to use the schedule. The new versions of Tables 1 and 2 use the same colors as previous iterations but have changes for improved cognition and notes pages with a larger font, made possible by the removal of the table of contraindications and precautions for vaccines recommended for adults. The cover page refers readers to www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/general-recs to access the information on vaccine contraindications and precautions.

Continue Reading Below

Influenza Vaccination

Part of the ACIP update included recommendations for the live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV). Although LAIV was not recommended in the US during the 2016 to 2017 or 2017 to 2018 influenza seasons, any licensed flu vaccine is now recommended for the 2018 to 2019 season if it is appropriate for the age and health status of the patient being immunized. Individuals who are not recommended to receive the LAIV are those with immunocompromised conditions (eg, HIV infection), an anatomical or functional asplenia, are pregnant, have received influenza antiviral medications in the previous 48 hours, have a cerebrospinal fluid leak, or have a cochlear implant. In the 2019 ACIP recommendations, routine administration of LAIV is recommended on an annual basis in all individuals aged ≥6 months who do not have contraindications to receiving the vaccine. 

Hepatitis B Vaccination

The single-antigen recombinant hepatitis B vaccine with a novel cytosine-phosphate-guanine 1018 oligodeoxynucleotide adjuvant (Heplisav-B®, Dynavax®) was recommended in February 2018 by the ACIP for preventing hepatitis B in adults. Heplisav-B is administered in 2 doses that are ≥4 weeks apart, a regimen approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in November 2017. Heplisav-B may be used as a substitute with a different hepatitis B vaccine in a 3-dose series, “but a valid 2-dose series requires 2 doses of Heplisav-B with at least 4 weeks between them,” the ACIP task force wrote in their paper. The ACIP did recommend Heplisav-B in pregnant women with an indication for the immunization due to the lack of safety data on the vaccine in this population. The ACIP also noted that indications for the hepatitis C vaccine were similar to those for the hepatitis B vaccine and may be administered in a 2- or 3-dose series depending on the vaccine.

Hepatitis A Vaccine

While the ACIP recommended the addition of homelessness as an indication for hepatitis A vaccination with either a 2-dose series of single-antigen vaccine or a 3-dose series of hepatitis A and B in 2018, additional populations have been included in the update. Populations with an increased risk for the hepatitis A virus or severe hepatitis A disease include individuals with chronic liver disease or clotting factor disorders, have close personal contact with an international adoptee in the first 60 days after arrival from a country with high hepatitis A virus prevalence, are travelers in countries with high or intermediate hepatitis A virus prevalence, are men who have sex with men, routinely use injection or non-injection drugs, and individuals who work with hepatitis A virus in a laboratory setting. Any individual who wants to be vaccinated against the hepatitis A virus may also be vaccinated.

Read More

Link Between Gut Bacteria, Atopic Dermatitis Development

Share this content:
The investigators sought to determine how the natural environment or diet protects potentially at-risk populations from such allergic conditions as atopic dermatitis.
The investigators sought to determine how the natural environment or diet protects potentially at-risk populations from such allergic conditions as atopic dermatitis.

A detailed microbiome analysis conducted in a group of children from rural South African communities has revealed differences in the gut microbiota of toddlers with atopic dermatitis (AD) linked to their diet. Results were published in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

The investigators sought to determine how the natural environment or diet protects potentially at-risk populations from such allergic conditions as AD, thus helping to elucidate the causes of the current global increase in atopic diseases. They characterized the gut microbiota of South african black (Xhosa) children from the remote rural Mqanduli district of the Eastern Cape in association with AD. Patients with AD were recruited from the Dermatology Department of the Nelson Mandela Academic Hospital in Umtata, Eastern Cape, South Africa. Control, nonallergic, non-food-sensitized participants were recruited from areas surrounding 10 district community health clinics.

Continue Reading Below

A total of 83 children were recruited for this study: 36 participants with AD and 47 control patients without AD. The fecal microbiota of these children were analyzed and compared with respect to the presence of AD, other clinical variables, and their diet.

AD was significantly associated with food sensitization (P =.0001), but not with allergic rhinitis (P =.14) or wheezing (P =.73). Moreover, children with AD had a significantly higher daily consumption of total sugar (P =.007) and saturated fat (P =.003) than control patients.

Notably, having been breastfed at all, as well as the duration of exclusive breastfeeding and total breastfeeding, was not associated with an individual’s AD status (P =.73, P =.67, and P =.72, respectively).

The relative abundance of Prevotella copri was significantly decreased in children with AD compared with those without the disorder (1.45±3.94 vs 0.38±0.53, respectively; P <.00001). Further, children with high sugar content in their diet had significantly lower P copri levels than those with lower median sugar intake (0.43±0.52 vs 1.04±3.32, respectively; P <.0001).

The investigators concluded that based on the decreased prevalence of P copri in the participants with AD, these bacteria may play a protective role against the development of this disorder. Additional studies are warranted to evaluate the underlying mechanism of this association relative to gut microbiota.

Follow @ClinicalPainAdv

Reference

Mahdavinia M, Rasmussen HE, Botha M, et al. Effects of diet on the childhood gut microbiome and its implications for atopic dermatitis [published online December 19, 2018]. J Allergy Clin Immunol. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.11.034

Read More

PAC‐14028 Cream Safe, Effective for Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis

Share this content:
194 participants with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis were randomly assigned to receive vehicle cream or 0.1%, 0.3%, or 1.0% PAC‐14028 cream twice daily.
194 participants with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis were randomly assigned to receive vehicle cream or 0.1%, 0.3%, or 1.0% PAC‐14028 cream twice daily.

PAC‐14028, a transient receptor potential vanilloid subfamily member 1 (TRPV1) agonist, appears to be a safe and effective topical treatment for patients with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis, according to data published in the British Journal of Dermatology.  

Researchers in this double‐blind, multicenter, vehicle‐controlled, 8‐week, phase IIb trial randomly assigned 194 participants with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis into groups receiving vehicle cream or 0.1%, 0.3%, or 1.0% PAC‐14028 cream twice daily. The primary efficacy end point was success rate defined as percentage of participants with an Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score of 1 or 0 at week 8. Secondary end points included Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) 75/90 and Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD).  

Continue Reading Below

At week 8, IGA success was achieved by 14.58% of participants in the vehicle cream group compared with 42.55% in the 0.1% PAC-14028 group (P =.0025 vs vehicle), 38.30% in the 0.3% PAC‐14028 group (P =.0087 vs vehicle), and 57.45% in the 1.0% PAC‐14028 group (P <.001 vs vehicle). Statistically significant differences between treatment groups and vehicle cream were particularly observed for 2-grade IGA success rate improvements from baseline (4.2% for vehicle cream; 21.3% for 0.1% PAC‐14028, P =.0121; 27.7% for 0.3% PAC‐14028, P =.0017; and 38.3% for 1.0% PAC‐14028, <.001). Trends towards improvement were seen in EASI 75/90, SCORAD index, pruritus visual analogue scale, and sleep disturbance score for all treatment groups, with significant improvements observed in sleep disturbance score from week 3 of treatment in the 1.0% PAC‐14028 cream group (P <.05 vs vehicle). There were no significant safety issues reported.

Study investigators concluded that PAC‐14028 cream is an effective, favorably tolerable treatment option for mild to moderate atopic dermatitis. They noted that “[b]ased on these results, a phase III programme is underway to assess the efficacy and safety of PAC‐14028 topical cream 1.0% in adolescent and adult patients with mild‐to‐moderate AD (NCT02965118).”

Disclosures: Study funding was provided by AmorePacific Corporation.

Follow @DermAdvisor

Reference

Lee YW, Won CH, Jung K, et al. Efficacy and safety of PAC‐14028 cream – a novel, topical, nonsteroidal, selective TRPV1 antagonist in patients with mild‐to‐moderate atopic dermatitis: a phase IIb randomized trial [published online January 8, 2019]. Br J Dermatol. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17455

Read More